
There are many misconceptions about koi food. The biggest one is undoubtedly the idea that the crude ash percentage should be as low as possible. In this chapter, KiGen definitively debunks this assumption.
The crude ash content in KiGen food is higher than average. However, this is a deliberate and well-founded choice. The higher percentage is the direct result of essential additions that we consider vital for the health and vitality of koi. This includes salt, which makes up about 2.5% of the total food composition, and montmorillonite clay, a valuable mineral that is standard in all KiGen feeds.
Below is a complete and clear explanation of the function and importance of crude ash in high-quality koi food.
Crude ash is NOT an ingredient, but an analytical measurement.
It is the residue left after the food has been completely burned (±550–600°C). Everything that doesn’t burn—minerals and inorganic substances—is measured as crude ash.
Important:
It says nothing about:
The reasoning many hobbyists use is understandable but oversimplified:
“Crude ash is indigestible > indigestible is ballast > ballast is bad > so crude ash must be as low as possible.”
This reasoning ignores one crucial point: Not everything that is indigestible is useless or harmful. In fact, for koi, certain indigestible substances are functionally necessary!
Salts and electrolytes (Na, K, Cl)
Sodium chloride (salt) is fully included in crude ash.
Functions in koi:
Essential for health.
Calcium & Phosphorus (Ca / P)
Both minerals significantly increase the crude ash value.
Functions:
Too low Ca/P is harmful. Too high Ca/P can be problematic.
Balance is crucial, not the lowest possible crude ash.
Trace elements (Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Se)
All part of crude ash.
Functions:
These substances:
Montmorillonite clay
Properties:
But functional:
Classic example of a functional indigestible substance.
Silicates & trace element-rich ash components
In natural food (algae, biofilm, sediment particles), koi also ingest inorganic fractions.
Functions:
Crude ash can be negative when:
The problem is not the crude ash, but its composition.
A better approach:
“What does the crude ash consist of and why?”
Crude ash is:
The quality and composition are decisive, not the percentage alone.